Hyundai Atos 2003 vs Renault Clio 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.1 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 59 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 83 NM | 105 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 20.7 seconds | 13 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai Atos engine produces 16 HP less power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 22 NM less than Renault Clio. Due to the lower power, Hyundai Atos reaches 100 km/h speed 7.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 5.9 | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Hyundai Atos consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai Atos could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 510 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 630 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.56 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.52 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Hyundai Atos is smaller, but higher. Hyundai Atos is 25 cm shorter than the Renault Clio, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai Atos is 15 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 263 litres | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1084 litres | no data | |
|
Renault Clio has more luggage space. Hyundai Atos has 247 litres less trunk space than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.1 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Atos is 1.2 metres less than that of the Renault Clio, which means Hyundai Atos can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`400 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Hyundai Atos has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Hyundai Atos, so Hyundai Atos quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Atos has
|
Renault Clio has
| |