Hyundai Atos 2003 vs Renault Clio 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.1 (petrol) | 1.1 - 1.9 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 59 HP | 60 - 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 83 NM | 93 - 185 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.8 - 20.7 seconds | 9.6 - 15 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 - 6.8 | 4.2 - 7.4 | |
|
Hyundai Atos petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Renault Clio. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.56 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.52 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Hyundai Atos is smaller, but higher. Hyundai Atos is 25 cm shorter than the Renault Clio, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai Atos is 15 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 263 litres | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1084 litres | no data | |
|
Renault Clio has more luggage space. Hyundai Atos has 247 litres less trunk space than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.1 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Atos is 1.6 metres less than that of the Renault Clio, which means Hyundai Atos can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`400 | ~ 1`495 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Atos has
|
Renault Clio has
| |