Hyundai Atos 2003 vs Hyundai Atos 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.1 | 1.1 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 59 HP | 63 HP | |
| Torque: | 83 NM | 97 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.8 - 20.7 seconds | 15.2 - 18.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 - 6.8 | 5.5 - 6.1 | |
|
Hyundai Atos 2003 petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Hyundai Atos 2005. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.56 m | 3.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.52 m | 1.52 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.57 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Hyundai Atos 2003 and Hyundai Atos 2005 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 263 litres | 220 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1084 litres | no data | |
|
Hyundai Atos 2003 has more luggage capacity. Hyundai Atos 2003 has 43 litres more trunk space than the Hyundai Atos 2005. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.1 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Atos 2003 is 0.7 metres less than that of the Hyundai Atos 2005, which means Hyundai Atos 2003 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`400 | ~ 1`400 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Atos has
|
Hyundai Atos has
| |