Hyundai Atos 2005 vs Hyundai Atos 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.1 | 1.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 63 HP | 58 HP | |
| Torque: | 97 NM | 84 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.2 - 18.9 seconds | 15.1 - 19.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 - 6.1 | 6.1 - 6.8 | |
|
Hyundai Atos 2005 petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Hyundai Atos 2002. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.56 m | 3.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.52 m | 1.50 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.58 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Hyundai Atos 2005 is 6 cm longer than the Hyundai Atos 2002, 2 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai Atos 2005 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 263 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1084 litres | |
|
Hyundai Atos 2002 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Hyundai Atos 2005 has 43 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Atos 2002. This could mean that the Hyundai Atos 2005 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`400 | ~ 1`316 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Atos has
|
Hyundai Atos has
| |