Honda Saber 1995 vs Volvo 940 1996
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 135 HP | |
| Torque: | 226 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11 seconds | |
| Honda Saber engine produces 45 HP more power than Volvo 940, but torque is 4 NM less than Volvo 940. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 75 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Honda Saber) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Volvo 940) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.41 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Honda Saber is 3 cm shorter than the Volvo 940, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 471 litres | |
|
Volvo 940 has more luggage space. Honda Saber has 71 litres less trunk space than the Volvo 940. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`400 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Saber has
|
Volvo 940 has
| |