Honda S2000 2004 vs Chrysler PT Cruiser 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Honda S2000 is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Chrysler PT Cruiser has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Honda S2000 is available with rear wheel drive, while Chrysler PT Cruiser can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 | 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 143 - 223 HP | |
| Torque: | 208 NM | 220 - 332 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.2 seconds | 7.6 - 12.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 9.4 - 10.4 | |
|
Honda S2000 petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chrysler PT Cruiser. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.29 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.28 m | 1.54 m | |
| Honda S2000 is 15 cm shorter than the Chrysler PT Cruiser, width is practically the same , while the height of Honda S2000 is 26 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 143 litres | 210 litres | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser has more luggage space. Honda S2000 has 67 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler PT Cruiser. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda S2000 is 1.2 metres less than that of the Chrysler PT Cruiser, which means Honda S2000 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`220 | ~ 1`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda S2000 has
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser has
| |