Honda S2000 2004 vs Chrysler Crossfire 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Honda S2000 is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Chrysler Crossfire has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 | 3.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 218 - 335 HP | |
| Torque: | 208 NM | 310 - 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.2 seconds | 5.3 - 6.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 10.1 - 11.0 | |
|
Honda S2000 petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chrysler Crossfire. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.06 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.28 m | 1.32 m | |
| Honda S2000 is 8 cm longer than the Chrysler Crossfire, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Honda S2000 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 143 litres | 105 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 190 litres | |
|
Honda S2000 has more luggage capacity. Honda S2000 has 38 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler Crossfire. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda S2000 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Chrysler Crossfire, which means Honda S2000 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`220 | ~ 1`695 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda S2000 has
|
Chrysler Crossfire has
| |