Honda Prelude 1992 vs Toyota Celica 1994
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 133 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 179 NM | 186 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
|
Toyota Celica is a more dynamic driving. Honda Prelude engine produces 42 HP less power than Toyota Celica, whereas torque is 7 NM less than Toyota Celica. Due to the lower power, Honda Prelude reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 9.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.7 l/100km | 8.9 l/100km | |
|
The Honda Prelude is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda Prelude consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica, which means that by driving the Honda Prelude over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda Prelude consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 680 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Honda Prelude gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 21 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Toyota Carina E | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Celica might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.29 m | 1.30 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Honda Prelude is 2 cm longer than the Toyota Celica, 1 cm wider, while the height of Honda Prelude is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 283 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda Prelude is 0.6 metres more than that of the Toyota Celica, which means Honda Prelude can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`610 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Prelude has
|
Toyota Celica has
| |