Honda Prelude 1996 vs Mercedes CLK 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Honda Prelude is available with front wheel drive, while Mercedes CLK can be equipped with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.2 | 2.0 - 4.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 133 - 200 HP | 136 - 279 HP | |
| Torque: | 179 - 211 NM | 190 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 - 10.8 seconds | 6.3 - 11.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 - 10.4 | 9.4 - 11.2 | |
|
On average, the Honda Prelude petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Mercedes CLK. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.54 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.37 m | |
| Honda Prelude is 3 cm shorter than the Mercedes CLK, 3 cm wider, while the height of Honda Prelude is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 420 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda Prelude is 0.3 metres more than that of the Mercedes CLK. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`200 | ~ 1`853 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Prelude has
|
| |