Honda Legend 1998 vs Chrysler 300M 1998
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 205 HP | 254 HP | |
Torque: | 297 NM | 340 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
Chrysler 300M is a more dynamic driving. Honda Legend engine produces 49 HP less power than Chrysler 300M, whereas torque is 43 NM less than Chrysler 300M. Due to the lower power, Honda Legend reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.2 | 10.7 | |
The Chrysler 300M is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Honda Legend consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler 300M, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda Legend could require 225 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 64 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 550 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
720 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
Chrysler 300M gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.00 m | 5.00 m | |
Width: | 1.82 m | 1.92 m | |
Height: | 1.43 m | 1.42 m | |
Honda Legend and Chrysler 300M are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 530 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 530 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Honda Legend is 0.5 metres less than that of the Chrysler 300M, which means Honda Legend can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 2`120 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1800 | 1400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Chrysler 300M has
| |