Honda HR-V 2015 vs Ford EcoSport 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 172 NM | 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 14 seconds | |
| Honda HR-V engine produces 45 HP more power than Ford EcoSport, but torque is 43 NM less than Ford EcoSport. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 4.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
|
The Ford EcoSport is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda HR-V consumes 3.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford EcoSport, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda HR-V could require 555 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda HR-V consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford EcoSport. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 1180 km in combined cycle | |
| 660 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford EcoSport gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Ford EcoSport can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Ford EcoSport version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Honda HR-V is larger, but lower. Honda HR-V is 2 cm longer than the Ford EcoSport, width is practically the same , while the height of Honda HR-V is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 431 litres | 333 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1456 litres | 1238 litres | |
|
Honda HR-V has more luggage capacity. Honda HR-V has 98 litres more trunk space than the Ford EcoSport. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda HR-V (by 218 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda HR-V is 0.8 metres more than that of the Ford EcoSport, which means Honda HR-V can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`760 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Honda HR-V scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 16 600 | 10 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda HR-V has
|
Ford EcoSport has
| |