Honda HR-V 2015 vs Toyota RAV4 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 158 HP | |
| Torque: | 155 NM | 198 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
| Honda HR-V engine produces 28 HP less power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 43 NM less than Toyota RAV4. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 7.4 | |
|
The Honda HR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Honda HR-V consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that by driving the Honda HR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| Honda HR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | 191 mm (7.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Toyota RAV4 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Toyota RAV4 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from six 4x4 versions of Toyota RAV4 2010 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 380'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Lexus NX, Toyota C-HR | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota RAV4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Toyota RAV4 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Honda HR-V is smaller. Honda HR-V is 7 cm shorter than the Toyota RAV4, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Honda HR-V is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 431 litres | 586 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1456 litres | 1752 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space. Honda HR-V has 155 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 296 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda HR-V is 0.4 metres more than that of the Toyota RAV4, which means Honda HR-V can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`790 | 2`070 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 16 600 | 9800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda HR-V has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |