Honda HR-V 2015 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 155 NM | 154 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Honda HR-V is more dynamic to drive. Honda HR-V engine produces 13 HP more power than Mitsubishi ASX, whereas torque is 1 NM more than Mitsubishi ASX. Thanks to more power Honda HR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 6.1 | |
|
The Honda HR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Honda HR-V consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that by driving the Honda HR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 1260 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi ASX can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mitsubishi ASX version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from three 4x4 versions of Mitsubishi ASX 2016 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 380'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 14 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi ASX might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.63 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Honda HR-V and Mitsubishi ASX are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 431 litres | 384 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1456 litres | 1219 litres | |
|
Honda HR-V has more luggage capacity. Honda HR-V has 47 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda HR-V (by 237 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda HR-V is 0.8 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi ASX, which means Honda HR-V can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`790 | 1`870 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 16 600 | 13 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda HR-V has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |