Honda HR-V 2001 vs Nissan X-Trail 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Honda HR-V is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Nissan X-Trail has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 1.6 (petrol) | 2.0 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 - 124 HP | 136 - 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 - 144 NM | 192 - 314 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 - 11.2 seconds | 9.9 - 13.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 - 8.6 | 7.1 - 10.0 | |
|
Honda HR-V petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Nissan X-Trail. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.01 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.58 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Honda HR-V is smaller. Honda HR-V is 50 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Honda HR-V is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 285 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1841 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space. Honda HR-V has 125 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda HR-V is 0.1 metres less than that of the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`640 | ~ 2`009 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda HR-V has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |