Honda Civic 2001 vs Toyota Celica 2002
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.7 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 120 HP | 192 HP | |
Torque: | 152 NM | 180 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 7.4 seconds | |
Toyota Celica is a more dynamic driving. Honda Civic engine produces 72 HP less power than Toyota Celica, whereas torque is 28 NM less than Toyota Celica. Due to the lower power, Honda Civic reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 8.4 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km | |
The Honda Civic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda Civic consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica, which means that by driving the Honda Civic over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda Civic consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
870 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
720 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
Honda Civic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 280'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Honda Civic engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 7 years | 12 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Honda FR-V, Honda Stream | Used also on Toyota Corolla | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.44 m | 4.35 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.74 m | |
Height: | 1.40 m | 1.32 m | |
Honda Civic is 9 cm longer than the Toyota Celica, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Honda Civic is 8 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 441 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Honda Civic is 1.2 metres more than that of the Toyota Celica, which means Honda Civic can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`570 | 1`200 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1200 | 2400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Honda Civic has
|
Toyota Celica has
| |