Honda Civic 2001 vs Ford Cougar 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.7 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 - 125 HP | 130 - 205 HP | |
| Torque: | 152 - 153 NM | 176 - 234 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 - 10.9 seconds | 7.8 - 10.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 - 7.0 | 8.3 - 10.2 | |
|
Honda Civic petrol engines consumes on average 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Cougar. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.32 m | |
|
Honda Civic is smaller, but higher. Honda Civic is 26 cm shorter than the Ford Cougar, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Honda Civic is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 441 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 930 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Honda Civic has 11 litres more trunk space than the Ford Cougar. The Ford Cougar may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda Civic is 0.7 metres more than that of the Ford Cougar, which means Honda Civic can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`583 | ~ 1`799 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Civic has
|
Ford Cougar has
| |