Honda Civic 2003 vs Mazda 3 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.3 - 2.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 200 HP | 84 - 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 130 - 220 NM | 122 - 245 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.6 - 14.2 seconds | 9 - 14.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 - 8.9 | 5.0 - 8.2 | |
|
Honda Civic petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3. On average, a Honda Civic with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Mazda 3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Honda Civic is smaller. Honda Civic is 31 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Honda Civic is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 481 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 878 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda Civic is 1.9 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Honda Civic can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`133 | ~ 1`728 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.4/10 | 8.2/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Civic has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |