Honda Civic 2001 vs Mitsubishi Lancer 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.7 | 1.3 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 129 HP | 82 - 135 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 - 154 NM | 120 - 176 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 - 11.7 seconds | 9.7 - 13.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 - 7.5 | 6.5 - 8.4 | |
|
Honda Civic petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Lancer. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.46 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Honda Civic is 2 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Lancer, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 430 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Honda Civic has 20 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Lancer. The Mitsubishi Lancer may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`572 | ~ 1`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.2/10 | 8.7/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Civic has
|
| |