Honda CRX 1992 vs Volkswagen Vento 1993

 
Honda CRX
1992 - 1998
Volkswagen Vento
1993 - 1998
Body: CoupeSedan
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 125 HP75 HP
Torque: 142 NM126 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.5 seconds14.6 seconds
Honda CRX is more dynamic to drive.
Honda CRX engine produces 50 HP more power than Volkswagen Vento, whereas torque is 16 NM more than Volkswagen Vento. Thanks to more power Honda CRX reaches 100 km/h speed 4.1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.17.3
Real fuel consumption: 8.5 l/100km7.5 l/100km
The Volkswagen Vento is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Honda CRX consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Vento, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda CRX could require 120 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda CRX consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Vento.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 550 km in combined cycle750 km in combined cycle
520 km with real consumption730 km with real consumption
Volkswagen Vento gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.00 m4.38 m
Width: 1.70 m1.70 m
Height: 1.26 m1.42 m
Honda CRX is 38 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Vento, width is practically the same , while the height of Honda CRX is 16 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no datano data
Turning diameter: 9.2 meters10.7 meters
The turning circle of the Honda CRX is 1.5 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Vento, which means Honda CRX can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): no data1`200
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 2400800
Pros and Cons: Honda CRX has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • better manoeuvrability
Volkswagen Vento has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv