Honda CRX 1992 vs Kia Optima 2000
| Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 134 HP | |
| Torque: | 142 NM | 169 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Honda CRX engine produces 9 HP less power than Kia Optima, whereas torque is 27 NM less than Kia Optima. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 65 litres | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.26 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Honda CRX is smaller. Honda CRX is 73 cm shorter than the Kia Optima, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Honda CRX is 15 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 479 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CRX is 1.2 metres less than that of the Kia Optima, which means Honda CRX can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CRX has
|
Kia Optima has
| |