Honda CRX 1992 vs Volkswagen Vento 1993
Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 125 HP | 75 HP | |
Torque: | 142 NM | 126 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 14.6 seconds | |
Honda CRX is more dynamic to drive. Honda CRX engine produces 50 HP more power than Volkswagen Vento, whereas torque is 16 NM more than Volkswagen Vento. Thanks to more power Honda CRX reaches 100 km/h speed 5.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 7.3 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
By specification Honda CRX consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Vento, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda CRX could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda CRX consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Vento. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
590 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
Volkswagen Vento gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.00 m | 4.38 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.26 m | 1.42 m | |
Honda CRX is 38 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Vento, width is practically the same , while the height of Honda CRX is 16 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 10.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Honda CRX is 1.5 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Vento, which means Honda CRX can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`200 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 2400 | 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Honda CRX has
|
Volkswagen Vento has
| |