Ford Sierra 1989 vs Fiat Croma 1986
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.9 Petrol | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 146 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 229 NM | 162 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 16.5 seconds | |
|
Ford Sierra is more dynamic to drive. Ford Sierra engine produces 71 HP more power than Fiat Croma, whereas torque is 67 NM more than Fiat Croma. Thanks to more power Ford Sierra reaches 100 km/h speed 7.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.6 | 6.2 | |
|
The Fiat Croma is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Sierra consumes 5.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Croma, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Sierra could require 810 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 510 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
| Fiat Croma gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Ford Sierra is smaller. Ford Sierra is 5 cm shorter than the Fiat Croma, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Sierra is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`350 | 1`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Sierra has
|
Fiat Croma has
| |