Ford Sierra 1990 vs Volvo 940 1990

 
Ford Sierra
1990 - 1993
Volvo 940
1990 - 1994
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 120 HP112 HP
Torque: 171 NM158 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.7 seconds13 seconds
Ford Sierra is more dynamic to drive.
Ford Sierra engine produces 8 HP more power than Volvo 940, whereas torque is 13 NM more than Volvo 940. Thanks to more power Ford Sierra reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.89.4
Real fuel consumption: 8.2 l/100km9.9 l/100km
The Ford Sierra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Ford Sierra consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 940, which means that by driving the Ford Sierra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Sierra consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 940.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres75 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 760 km in combined cycle790 km in combined cycle
730 km with real consumption750 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.47 m4.87 m
Width: 1.70 m1.75 m
Height: 1.41 m1.41 m
Ford Sierra is smaller.
Ford Sierra is 40 cm shorter than the Volvo 940, 5 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: no data471 litres
Turning diameter: 10 meters9.9 meters
The turning circle of the Ford Sierra is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volvo 940.
Gross weight (kg): 1`3501`865
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

above average
Volvo 940 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Ford Sierra has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Volvo 940, so Volvo 940 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 18001800
Pros and Cons: Ford Sierra has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
Volvo 940 has
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv