Ford Sierra 1990 vs Mazda 626 1988
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 109 HP | |
| Torque: | 171 NM | 165 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
| Ford Sierra engine produces 11 HP more power than Mazda 626, whereas torque is 6 NM more than Mazda 626. Despite the higher power, Ford Sierra reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 8.7 | |
|
The Ford Sierra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Sierra consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626, which means that by driving the Ford Sierra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| Ford Sierra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.51 m | 4.59 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Sierra is 8 cm shorter than the Mazda 626, 3 cm wider, while the height of Ford Sierra is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`350 | 1`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Sierra has
|
Mazda 626 has
| |