Ford Sierra 1990 vs Mazda 626 1988

 
Ford Sierra
1990 - 1993
Mazda 626
1988 - 1990
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 120 HP109 HP
Torque: 171 NM165 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.2 seconds14.4 seconds
Ford Sierra is more dynamic to drive.
Ford Sierra engine produces 11 HP more power than Mazda 626, whereas torque is 6 NM more than Mazda 626. Thanks to more power Ford Sierra reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.79.2
The Ford Sierra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Ford Sierra consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626, which means that by driving the Ford Sierra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 770 km in combined cycle650 km in combined cycle
Ford Sierra gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Front-wheel drive cars (Mazda 626) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Ford Sierra) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions.

Dimensions

Length: 4.51 m4.59 m
Width: 1.72 m1.69 m
Height: 1.43 m1.46 m
Both cars are similar in size. Ford Sierra is 8 cm shorter than the Mazda 626, 3 cm wider, while the height of Ford Sierra is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no datano data
Turning diameter: 10 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): 1`3501`100
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

above average
Average price (€): 10002200
Pros and Cons: Ford Sierra has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Mazda 626 has
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv