Ford Sierra 1990 vs Audi 100 1991
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 HP | 101 HP | |
| Torque: | 119 NM | 157 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.7 seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
|
Audi 100 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Sierra engine produces 30 HP less power than Audi 100, whereas torque is 38 NM less than Audi 100. Due to the lower power, Ford Sierra reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 8.5 | |
| Ford Sierra consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi 100, which means that by driving the Ford Sierra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| Audi 100 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.51 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Ford Sierra is smaller. Ford Sierra is 28 cm shorter than the Audi 100, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Sierra is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 390 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1310 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Sierra is 1.4 metres less than that of the Audi 100, which means Ford Sierra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 900 | 1`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Sierra has
|
Audi 100 has
| |