Ford Sierra 1990 vs Volvo 940 1990
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Ford Sierra is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volvo 940 can be equipped only with rear wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 2.0 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 71 - 220 HP | 82 - 165 HP | |
Torque: | 119 - 290 NM | 145 - 264 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 - 16.4 seconds | 9 - 16.5 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 - 10.6 | 7.5 - 10.3 | |
Ford Sierra petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo 940. On average, Ford Sierra equipped with diesel engines consume 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 940. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.47 m | 4.87 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.75 m | |
Height: | 1.41 m | 1.41 m | |
Ford Sierra is smaller. Ford Sierra is 40 cm shorter than the Volvo 940, 5 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 471 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 9.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford Sierra is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volvo 940. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`193 | ~ 1`878 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | above average | |
Average price (€): | 1800 | 1800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Sierra has
|
Volvo 940 has
| |