Ford Sierra 1990 vs BMW 3 series 1983

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Ford Sierra
1990 - 1993
BMW 3 series
1983 - 1991
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.6 - 2.01.6 - 2.7

Performance

Power: 71 - 220 HP86 - 170 HP
Torque: 119 - 290 NM140 - 230 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.9 - 16.4 seconds8.3 - 18 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.4 - 10.66.9 - 10.0
Ford Sierra petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than BMW 3 series. On average, Ford Sierra equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.47 m4.32 m
Width: 1.70 m1.64 m
Height: 1.41 m1.38 m
Ford Sierra is larger.
Ford Sierra is 15 cm longer than the BMW 3 series, 6 cm wider, while the height of Ford Sierra is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data425 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data425 litres
Turning diameter: 10 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Ford Sierra is 1 metres less than that of the BMW 3 series, which means Ford Sierra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`193~ 1`610
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average
no data
Average price (€): 18004200
Pros and Cons: Ford Sierra has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv