Ford Sierra 1990 vs Volvo 850 1993
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ford Sierra is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volvo 850 can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | 2.3 - 2.4 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 - 120 HP | 140 - 226 HP | |
| Torque: | 119 - 171 NM | 206 - 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 - 16.4 seconds | 7.5 - 11 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 - 8.5 | 9.1 - 9.7 | |
|
Ford Sierra petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo 850. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.51 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Ford Sierra is smaller. Ford Sierra is 20 cm shorter than the Volvo 850, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Sierra is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volvo 850. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`207 | ~ 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Sierra has
|
Volvo 850 has
| |