Ford Sierra 1990 vs Mazda 626 1988
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ford Sierra is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mazda 626 can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 1.8 - 2.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 - 120 HP | 61 - 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 119 - 171 NM | 121 - 178 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 - 16.4 seconds | 10.5 - 20.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 - 8.5 | 6.9 - 9.2 | |
|
Ford Sierra petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda 626. On average, Ford Sierra equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.51 m | 4.59 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Sierra is 8 cm shorter than the Mazda 626, 3 cm wider, while the height of Ford Sierra is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Sierra is 0.8 metres less than that of the Mazda 626, which means Ford Sierra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`207 | ~ 1`066 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Sierra has
|
Mazda 626 has
| |