Ford Sierra 1990 vs Nissan X-Trail 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ford Sierra is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Nissan X-Trail can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Ford Sierra also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 - 120 HP | 114 - 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 119 - 171 NM | 192 - 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 - 16.4 seconds | 9.9 - 13.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 - 8.5 | 7.2 - 10.0 | |
|
Ford Sierra petrol engines consumes on average 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Nissan X-Trail. On average, Ford Sierra equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.51 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.68 m | |
| Ford Sierra and Nissan X-Trail are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1841 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Sierra is 1 metres less than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Ford Sierra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`207 | ~ 2`010 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Sierra has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |