Ford S-Max 2006 vs Chrysler Voyager 2007
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 140 HP | 149 HP | |
Torque: | 320 NM | 360 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | n/a seconds | |
Ford S-Max engine produces 9 HP less power than Chrysler Voyager, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Chrysler Voyager. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | no data | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 75 litres | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.77 m | 4.81 m | |
Width: | 1.85 m | 2.00 m | |
Height: | 1.66 m | 1.75 m | |
Ford S-Max is smaller. Ford S-Max is 4 cm shorter than the Chrysler Voyager, 15 cm narrower, while the height of Ford S-Max is 9 cm lower. | |||
Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
Trunk capacity: | 854 litres | 440 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 854 litres | no data | |
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 440 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2100 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford S-Max is 0.1 metres more than that of the Chrysler Voyager. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 1`600 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | low | |
Ford S-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chrysler Voyager has serious deffects in 160 percent more cases than Ford S-Max, so Ford S-Max quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 4000 | 1800 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.9/10 | 8.1/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford S-Max has
|
Chrysler Voyager has
| |