Ford Ranger 2011 vs Ford Explorer 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 166 HP | 249 HP | |
| Torque: | 226 NM | 345 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
|
Ford Explorer is a more dynamic driving. Ford Ranger engine produces 83 HP less power than Ford Explorer, whereas torque is 119 NM less than Ford Explorer. Due to the lower power, Ford Ranger reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.8 | 11.0 | |
| Ford Ranger consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Explorer, which means that by driving the Ford Ranger over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 790 km on highway | ||
| Ford Ranger gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 5.01 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Ford Ranger is 35 cm longer than the Ford Explorer, 15 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1450 litres | 595 litres | |
|
Ford Ranger has more luggage capacity. Ford Ranger has 855 litres more trunk space than the Ford Explorer. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.7 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`200 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 18 200 | 13 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Ford Explorer has
| |