Ford Ranger 2006 vs Toyota RAV4 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 161 HP | |
| Torque: | 209 NM | 224 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford Ranger engine produces 18 HP less power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 15 NM less than Toyota RAV4. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 8.5 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 56 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 203 mm (8 inches) | 160 mm (6.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Ford Ranger can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Ford Ranger version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from eight 4x4 versions of Ford Ranger 2006 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 4.20 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Ford Ranger is larger. Ford Ranger is 88 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 7 cm wider, while the height of Ford Ranger is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1500 litres | 678 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1909 litres | |
|
Ford Ranger has more luggage capacity. Ford Ranger has 822 litres more trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`854 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 7400 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |