Ford Ranger 2006 vs Mitsubishi L 200 1996
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 156 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.6 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford Ranger engine produces 56 HP more power than Mitsubishi L 200, whereas torque is 140 NM more than Mitsubishi L 200. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 75 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 203 mm (8 inches) | 215 mm (8.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi L 200 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 4.94 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Ford Ranger is larger, but slightly lower. Ford Ranger is 14 cm longer than the Mitsubishi L 200, 11 cm wider, while the height of Ford Ranger is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1500 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`830 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7400 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has
| |