Ford Ranger 2006 vs Subaru B9 Tribeca 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 207 HP | 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 323 NM | 297 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
| Ford Ranger engine produces 38 HP less power than Subaru B9 Tribeca, but torque is 26 NM more than Subaru B9 Tribeca. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 12.3 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 64 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.69 m | |
| Ford Ranger is 22 cm longer than the Subaru B9 Tribeca, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Ranger is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1500 litres | 450 litres | |
|
Ford Ranger has more luggage capacity. Ford Ranger has 1050 litres more trunk space than the Subaru B9 Tribeca. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7400 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Subaru B9 Tribeca has
| |