Ford Ranger 2015 vs Volkswagen Amarok 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 385 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
|
Ford Ranger is more dynamic to drive. Ford Ranger engine produces 20 HP more power than Volkswagen Amarok, whereas torque is 45 NM more than Volkswagen Amarok. Thanks to more power Ford Ranger reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 7.3 | |
| Ford Ranger consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Amarok, which means that by driving the Ford Ranger over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
| 1210 km on highway | 1260 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 5.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.83 m | |
| Ford Ranger is 11 cm longer than the Volkswagen Amarok, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Ranger is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`200 | 2`820 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 35 000 | 17 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Volkswagen Amarok has
| |