Ford Ranger 2015 vs Nissan Navara 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.3 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 385 NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Nissan Navara is a more dynamic driving. Ford Ranger engine produces 30 HP less power than Nissan Navara, whereas torque is 65 NM less than Nissan Navara. Due to the lower power, Ford Ranger reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 7.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.6 l/100km | 10.6 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Ranger is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Ford Ranger consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Navara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Ranger could require 150 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Ford Ranger consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Navara. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 73 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 1040 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 5.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.83 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Ranger is 3 cm longer than the Nissan Navara, 1 cm wider, while the height of Ford Ranger is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`200 | 3`250 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 35 000 | 30 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Nissan Navara has
| |