Ford Ranger 2015 vs Volkswagen Amarok 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 330 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.9 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Amarok is a more dynamic driving. Ford Ranger engine produces 50 HP less power than Volkswagen Amarok, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Volkswagen Amarok. Due to the lower power, Ford Ranger reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 7.6 | |
|
The Ford Ranger is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Ranger consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Amarok, which means that by driving the Ford Ranger over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1140 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 1230 km on highway | 1190 km on highway | ||
| Ford Ranger gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 5.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.95 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.83 m | |
| Ford Ranger is 11 cm longer than the Volkswagen Amarok, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Ranger is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`200 | 3`040 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 30 600 | 36 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Volkswagen Amarok has
| |