Ford Ranger 2015 vs Toyota Hilux 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 385 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
| Ford Ranger engine produces 10 HP more power than Toyota Hilux, but torque is 15 NM less than Toyota Hilux. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 7.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.9 l/100km | 9.5 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Ranger is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Ranger consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Hilux, which means that by driving the Ford Ranger over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Ranger consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Hilux. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1150 km in combined cycle | 1140 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km with real consumption | 840 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 5.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.82 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Ranger is 3 cm longer than the Toyota Hilux, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 13.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`200 | 3`210 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 31 200 | 23 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Toyota Hilux has
| |