Ford Ranger 2006 vs Toyota RAV4 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ford Ranger is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Toyota RAV4 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Ford Ranger also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.3 - 4.0 | 1.8 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 84 - 207 HP | 116 - 161 HP | |
| Torque: | 195 - 380 NM | 161 - 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 - 13.7 seconds | 10.6 - 12.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 - 10.2 | 7.1 - 9.3 | |
|
On average, Ford Ranger equipped with diesel engines consume 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 203 - 205 mm (8 - 8.1 inches) | 160 mm (6.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Ford Ranger can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 4.20 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Ford Ranger is larger. Ford Ranger is 88 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 5 cm wider, while the height of Ford Ranger is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1500 litres | 678 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1909 litres | |
|
Ford Ranger has more luggage capacity. Ford Ranger has 822 litres more trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.6 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Ranger is 1.9 metres more than that of the Toyota RAV4, which means Ford Ranger can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`986 | ~ 1`833 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 7400 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |