Ford Ranger 2006 vs Ford Ranger 2006

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Ford Ranger
2006 - 2012
Ford Ranger
2006 - 2012
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 2.3 - 4.02.3 - 4.0

Performance

Power: 84 - 207 HP143 - 207 HP
Torque: 195 - 380 NM209 - 380 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.5 - 13.7 seconds12 - 14.7 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.9 - 10.28.9 - 10.4
On average, Ford Ranger 2006 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger 2006.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Ground clearance: 203 - 205 mm (8 - 8.1 inches)203 - 205 mm (8 - 8.1 inches)

Dimensions

Length: 5.08 m5.00 m
Width: 1.79 m1.87 m
Height: 1.73 m1.73 m
Ford Ranger 2006 is 8 cm longer than the Ford Ranger 2006, 8 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 1500 litres1500 litres
Turning diameter: 12.6 meters13 meters
The turning circle of the Ford Ranger 2006 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Ford Ranger 2006, which means Ford Ranger 2006 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`986~ 3`020
Safety:
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 74007400
Pros and Cons: Ford Ranger has
  • lower fuel consumption for diesel engines
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv