Ford Puma 1997 vs Toyota Celica 1994
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.7 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 157 NM | 154 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Ford Puma is more dynamic to drive. Ford Puma engine produces 9 HP more power than Toyota Celica, whereas torque is 3 NM more than Toyota Celica. Thanks to more power Ford Puma reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 7.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Puma is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Puma consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica, which means that by driving the Ford Puma over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Puma consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 540 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 650 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 510 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Celica gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota Carina E | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Celica might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.98 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.34 m | 1.30 m | |
|
Ford Puma is smaller, but slightly higher. Ford Puma is 44 cm shorter than the Toyota Celica, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Puma is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 283 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Puma is 0.4 metres less than that of the Toyota Celica, which means Ford Puma can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`510 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Puma has
|
Toyota Celica has
| |