Ford Puma 1997 vs Hyundai Coupe 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.7 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 139 HP | |
| Torque: | 157 NM | 182 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
|
Hyundai Coupe is a more dynamic driving. Ford Puma engine produces 14 HP less power than Hyundai Coupe, whereas torque is 25 NM less than Hyundai Coupe. Due to the lower power, Ford Puma reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 8.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 9.1 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Puma is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Puma consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Coupe, which means that by driving the Ford Puma over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Puma consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Coupe. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 540 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 650 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
| 510 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai Coupe gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 460'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Hyundai Coupe engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai Lantra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Coupe might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Hyundai Coupe engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.98 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.34 m | 1.30 m | |
|
Ford Puma is smaller, but slightly higher. Ford Puma is 36 cm shorter than the Hyundai Coupe, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Puma is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 362 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Puma is 1 metres less than that of the Hyundai Coupe, which means Ford Puma can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Puma has
|
Hyundai Coupe has
| |