Ford Puma 1997 vs Alfa Romeo GTV 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.7 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 157 NM | 271 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 7.4 seconds | |
|
Alfa Romeo GTV is a more dynamic driving. Ford Puma engine produces 75 HP less power than Alfa Romeo GTV, whereas torque is 114 NM less than Alfa Romeo GTV. Due to the lower power, Ford Puma reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 10.8 | |
|
The Ford Puma is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Puma consumes 3.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo GTV, which means that by driving the Ford Puma over 15,000 km in a year you can save 510 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 540 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 650 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| Alfa Romeo GTV gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.98 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.34 m | 1.32 m | |
|
Ford Puma is smaller, but slightly higher. Ford Puma is 30 cm shorter than the Alfa Romeo GTV, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Puma is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 110 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Puma is 1.2 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo GTV, which means Ford Puma can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`820 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Puma has
|
Alfa Romeo GTV has
| |