Ford Puma 1997 vs Volkswagen T-Roc 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Coupe | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
| Ford Puma is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Volkswagen T-Roc has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ford Puma is available only with front wheel drive, while Volkswagen T-Roc can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.7 (petrol) | 1.0 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 125 HP | 110 - 300 HP | |
| Torque: | 122 - 157 NM | 200 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 - 11.9 seconds | 4.9 - 10.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 - 7.4 | 4.3 - 6.7 | |
|
Ford Puma petrol engines consumes on average 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen T-Roc. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.98 m | 4.23 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.34 m | 1.57 m | |
|
Ford Puma is smaller. Ford Puma is 25 cm shorter than the Volkswagen T-Roc, 15 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Puma is 23 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 445 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1290 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Puma is 1.1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen T-Roc, which means Ford Puma can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`945 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 21 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Puma has
|
Volkswagen T-Roc has
| |