Ford Puma 1997 vs Hyundai Coupe 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ford Puma is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Hyundai Coupe has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.7 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 125 HP | 114 - 139 HP | |
| Torque: | 122 - 157 NM | 145 - 182 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 - 11.9 seconds | 8.6 - 10.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 - 7.4 | 8.3 - 9.9 | |
|
Ford Puma petrol engines consumes on average 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Hyundai Coupe. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.98 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.34 m | 1.31 m | |
|
Ford Puma is smaller, but slightly higher. Ford Puma is 36 cm shorter than the Hyundai Coupe, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Puma is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 362 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Puma is 1 metres less than that of the Hyundai Coupe, which means Ford Puma can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Puma has
|
Hyundai Coupe has
| |