Ford Mustang 1999 vs Chevrolet Impala 2000
| Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 3.8 Petrol | 3.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 193 HP | 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 298 NM | 305 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Impala is a more dynamic driving. Ford Mustang engine produces 11 HP less power than Chevrolet Impala, whereas torque is 7 NM less than Chevrolet Impala. Due to the lower power, Ford Mustang reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.0 | 9.8 | |
|
The Chevrolet Impala is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Mustang consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Impala, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mustang could require 330 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 480 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| Chevrolet Impala gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Chevrolet Impala) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Ford Mustang) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.35 m | 1.46 m | |
| Ford Mustang is 42 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Impala, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford Mustang is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 525 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 800 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Chevrolet Impala has
| |