Ford Mustang 1999 vs Chevrolet Camaro 1998
| Body: | Coupe | Cabrio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 3.8 Petrol | 3.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 193 HP | 193 HP | |
| Torque: | 298 NM | 305 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro is a more dynamic driving. Ford Mustang and Chevrolet Camaro have the same engine power, but Ford Mustang torque is 7 NM less than Chevrolet Camaro. Ford Mustang reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.0 | 11.7 | |
| Ford Mustang consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Camaro, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mustang could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 480 km in combined cycle | 500 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.91 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.35 m | 1.30 m | |
|
Ford Mustang is smaller, but higher. Ford Mustang is 25 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Camaro, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Mustang is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mustang is 0.1 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Camaro. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 800 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Chevrolet Camaro has
| |