Ford Mustang 2005 vs Mitsubishi Eclipse 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.6 Petrol | 3.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 304 HP | 263 HP | |
| Torque: | 427 NM | 353 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford Mustang engine produces 41 HP more power than Mitsubishi Eclipse, whereas torque is 74 NM more than Mitsubishi Eclipse. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.0 | 10.9 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Eclipse is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Mustang consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Eclipse, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mustang could require 315 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 67 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 460 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| 670 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Eclipse gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Mitsubishi Eclipse) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Ford Mustang) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.36 m | |
|
Ford Mustang is larger. Ford Mustang is 20 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Eclipse, 4 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mustang is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 445 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Eclipse has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Ford Mustang has 95 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Eclipse. This could mean that the Ford Mustang uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`945 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 11 600 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mustang has
|
Mitsubishi Eclipse has
| |